Trial reportClinical physiology and functional imaging2026
The combination of low-intensity resistance exercise and electrical muscle stimulation effectively enhances executive function in men.
Trial report in Clinical physiology and functional imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The combination of low-intensity resistance exercise and electrical muscle stimulation effectively enhances executive function in men.Clinical physiology and functional imaging · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesResistance exercise enhances executive function (EF) more effectively at moderate or higher intensities than at low intensity resistance exercise (LRE), probably with increased neural activity and lactate production to meet brain energy demands. Given that LRE remains widely applicable with less perceived exertion, and electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) increases lactate production and neural activation, we investigated whether combining LRE with EMS (LRE-EMS) effectively enhances EF, without increasing perceived exertion.
designA crossover randomized study.
methodsSeventeen young men participated in a crossover randomized study to assess the cognitive effects of LRE alone, EMS alone, and LRE-EMS. The LRE protocol involved knee extensions at 40% one-repetition maximum for 4 sets of 10 repetitions. During the EMS condition, the participants remained seated for 260 s to match the duration of the other conditions, with EMS applied to the lower limb muscles. Subjective perceptions of exertion and fatigue during exercise were recorded.
resultsIC and lactate were measured at baseline, immediately postexercise, and 15 min postexercise. The LRE condition did not significantly increase IC (p = 0.100), whereas LRE-EMS resulted in significant IC improvements immediately and 15 min postexercise (both p < 0.001), with greater lactate increases compared to LRE and EMS. EMS demonstrated significant IC improvement at 15 min postexercise (p = 0.022).
conclusionsPerceived exertion and fatigue were greater with LRE-EMS compared with LRE and EMS. These findings suggest that LRE combined with EMS and EMS alone are effective strategies for cognitive improvement, but increased perceived exertion still exists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.