Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338040›Full record

ArticleWater environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation2026

Statistical Optimization of Vegetable Washwater Treatment Using Electrocoagulation.

Ablema Sephora Tanoe, Patrick Drogui, Mahdieh Khajvand, Joahnn Palacios, Julien G Mahy, Adama Ndao, Kokou Adjallé, Stéphane Godbout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Statistical Optimization of Vegetable Washwater Treatment Using Electrocoagulation.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ablema Sephora TanoeInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS-ETE), Université du Québec, Québec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7553-7351
Patrick DroguiCentre des technologies de l'eau, Institut de recherche, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Mahdieh KhajvandInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS-ETE), Université du Québec, Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Joahnn PalaciosInstitut de recherche et de développement en agroenvironnement, Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Julien G MahyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Adama NdaoInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS-ETE), Université du Québec, Québec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7524-4059
Kokou AdjalléInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS-ETE), Université du Québec, Québec, Quebec, Canada.
Stéphane GodboutInstitut de recherche et de développement en agroenvironnement, Québec, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the application of electrocoagulation (EC) for treating vegetable washwater (VWW). Preliminary EC experiments were carried out to define the operational parameter ranges supporting a subsequent statistical optimization of the process. The optimization aimed to identify the most efficient operating conditions for pollutant removal while minimizing energy consumption. VWWs were sampled from four root vegetable washings (potatoes, leeks, and red beets). Various EC tests carried out using a 500-mL reactor and a response surface methodology of experiments enabled us to obtain optimum operating conditions for the treatment of VWW. Thus, optimal conditions of a current intensity of 0.32 A for 8.8 min with aluminum electrodes gave total suspended solid (TSS) and turbidity reduction rates of 99% and 98%, respectively, along with a total phosphorus reduction rate of 93% for Farm 1. EC VWW treatment generally met the regulatory discharge limit of 50-mg/L TSS. Only TSS of Farm 4 remained well above the limit. EC also reduced neonicotinoid insecticides present in VWW by 38%, and the true color of beet roots decreased from 283 to 60 UCV. The energy costs associated with VWW clarification treatment ranged between CAD$0.06/m

Indexed as

ElectrocoagulationVegetablesWaste Disposal, FluidWastewaterWater PurificationWater Pollutants, ChemicalWastewaterWater Pollutants, Chemicalelectrocoagulationneonicotinoidsresponse surface methodologyTSS removalvegetable washwater

Identifiers

PMID42338040
PMCPMC13291344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.