Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42338036›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026

Uncertainty quantification of U-Net based segmentation tool using conformal prediction.

Bailey J Borden, John B Graham-Knight, Patricia Lasserre, Sarah Lucas, Rasika D Rajapakshe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bailey J BordenThe University of British Columbia - Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
John B Graham-KnightThe University of British Columbia - Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Patricia LasserreThe University of British Columbia - Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Sarah LucasThe University of British Columbia - Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Rasika D RajapaksheThe University of British Columbia - Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

BC Cancer Studentship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe radiation therapy treatment process is very labour intensive, and artificial intelligence (AI) based auto contouring tools are increasingly being adopted to improve efficiency. However, current acceptance testing of AI auto contouring algorithms relies primarily on area- and distance-based metrics, with limited assessment of model uncertainty. PURPOSE: To demonstrate conformal prediction as a complementary error analysis technique for AI auto contouring algorithms, providing spatially localized uncertainty information that traditional metrics do not capture.

methodsA U-Net architecture with a ResNet-34 encoder was trained on BC Cancer breast data to segment the left lung, right lung, and the heart. Initial testing was performed on a subset of 376 computed tomography (CT) scans using both area-based (IoU) and distance-based (HD95) metrics. Conformal prediction using adaptive prediction sets was then performed on 138 CT scans. The change in the derivative of the intersection over union (IoU) between the original predictions and the conformal predictions was observed with respect to the selected confidence level.

resultsU-Net achieved a mean IoU of 0.924 and a mean HD95 of 11.35. When conformal prediction was applied using a 90% confidence threshold, the percent differences between the conformal prediction IoUs and the U-Net prediction IoUs were 1.01%, 0.89%, and 1.46% for the left lung, right lung, and the heart, respectively. The IoU derivatives differed significantly between true positive and false positive structure predictions (P < 0.001), indicating that conformal prediction can distinguish reliable predictions from unreliable ones.

conclusionsConformal prediction provides an additional tool for acceptance testing of AI auto contouring algorithms. Beyond traditional area- and distance-based metrics, it spatially localizes uncertain predictions and offers a mechanism for identifying false positives.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedFemaleHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedUncertaintyautomationbreastcomputer visionCTdeep learningmachine learningmodel uncertaintysegmentation

Identifiers

PMID42338036
PMCPMC13291182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.