ArticleANZ journal of surgery
Factors Associated With Pancreatectomy Among Australians With Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Study.
Article in ANZ journal of surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors Associated With Pancreatectomy Among Australians With Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Study.ANZ journal of surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPancreatectomy offers a potential cure for pancreatic cancer but may not be accessible to all Australians. We aimed to explore sociodemographic, healthcare and patient factors associated with undergoing pancreatectomy.
methodsThis study used a nationally linked dataset from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, including people diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between July 2010 and December 2018 (excluding Western Australia and the Northern Territory). Pancreatectomy trends were analysed using Joinpoint regression, and associations with sociodemographic, clinical and healthcare factors were assessed using log-binomial regression, with causal mediation analysis assessing the extent to which private specialist visits mediated each association.
resultsAmong 22 739 individuals with pancreatic cancer (mean age 72.5 years; 51% male), 15% underwent pancreatectomy. Uptake increased over time, with an average six-monthly increase of 1.36% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63-2.11). After adjustment for age, sex and comorbidities, older age was strongly associated with lower pancreatectomy prevalence (80+ years vs. 60-69 years: prevalence ratio [PR] = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.14-0.19). Lower prevalence was observed in remote areas (PR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.43-0.77) and the most disadvantaged socioeconomic group (PR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.68-0.82). Conversely, private specialist visits (PR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.50-1.72) and general practitioner (GP) visits were associated with higher prevalence. Private specialist visits explained 61% of the regional-metropolitan difference and 41% of the high-low GP visits difference, and counteracted the negative effect of comorbidities.
conclusionsUndergoing pancreatectomy is associated with sociodemographic, clinical and healthcare factors. Understanding the reasons is crucial to improving equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.