Trial reportClinical and translational science2026
Model-Informed Development of a Subcutaneous Formulation of Tislelizumab: Phase 1 Pharmacokinetics in Patients With Cancer.
Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06091943 (Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Bioavailability of Tislelizumab Via Subcutaneous Injection in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Bioavailability of Tislelizumab Via Subcutaneous Injection in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Model-Informed Development of a Subcutaneous Formulation of Tislelizumab: Phase 1 Pharmacokinetics in Patients With Cancer.Clinical and translational science · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although tislelizumab is approved across multiple malignancies and dosing schedules, intravenous administration imposes logistical burdens. A subcutaneous formulation may improve convenience and reduce resource demands if comparable exposure is achieved. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and injection-site performance of subcutaneous tislelizumab and used population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling and simulations to support phase 3 dose selection. In the phase 1 BGB-A317-103 study, treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer received tislelizumab via subcutaneous thigh, subcutaneous abdominal, or intravenous administration. A PopPK model was developed with subcutaneous compartments to characterize site-specific absorption and covariate effects. Simulations compared subcutaneous 300 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W) with intravenous 200 mg Q3W regimens to estimate the probability of achieving comparable pharmacokinetic exposure. The PopPK model demonstrated greater bioavailability and lower variability with subcutaneous thigh vs. abdominal administration. Estimated absorption rates were 0.189 1/d for thigh and 0.247 1/d for abdomen, with corresponding bioavailability estimates of 86.6% and 73.1%. The model described absorption and exposure across administration routes and supported the simulation of 1,000 trials. Subcutaneous 300 mg thigh administration achieved pharmacokinetic exposures comparable to intravenous 200 mg across key parameters, including trough concentration and area under the curve (AUC) at Cycle 1 and steady state, whereas abdominal administration showed reduced probability of achieving target exposure thresholds for Cycle 1 AUC. Tislelizumab 300 mg Q3W subcutaneous thigh administration is predicted to provide exposure comparable to intravenous 200 mg Q3W, supporting its selection for phase 3 evaluation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06091943.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.