Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42337861›Full record

SynthesisInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Financial Toxicity and Its Determinants in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis.

Muhammed Shabil, Eswaran Maheswari, Amogh Verma

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muhammed ShabilDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, MS Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Eswaran MaheswariDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, MS Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Amogh VermaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rama Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2499-4874

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionFinancial toxicity is an important but insufficiently synthesized dimension of cardiovascular disease burden, reflecting the economic hardship caused by out-of-pocket payments, indirect costs, medical debt, and affordability-related barriers to care.MethodsA systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to May 2025 for studies evaluating financial toxicity among patients with cardiovascular diseases. Random-effects meta-analysis and Bayesian hierarchical models were used to estimate pooled prevalence, credible intervals, heterogeneity, and determinants of financial toxicity.ResultsThirty studies including 1,087,594 patients were analyzed across diverse healthcare systems and cardiovascular conditions. Catastrophic health expenditure exceeding 40% of out-of-pocket spending affected 28% of patients in frequentist analysis and 34% in Bayesian analysis, while the 20% threshold affected 15%. Difficulty paying medical bills was reported by 46% of patients, and 16-17% were unable to meet medical expenses. Heterogeneity was substantial across outcomes, reflecting differences in healthcare financing, disease severity, and socioeconomic context. Consistent determinants of financial toxicity included lack of insurance, low income, rural residence, younger age, longer hospitalization, private-sector care, and procedurally intensive treatment.ConclusionFinancial toxicity is highly prevalent among patients with cardiovascular diseases and is shaped by both socioeconomic vulnerability and healthcare system structure. Integrating financial risk screening, expanding insurance protection, reducing out-of-pocket expenditure, and targeting support toward high-risk groups are essential for improving equitable cardiovascular care.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCost of IllnessFinancing, PersonalHealth ExpendituresBayes TheoremHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMedical DebtSocioeconomic FactorsBayesian meta-analysiscardiovascular diseasecatastrophic health expenditurefinancial toxicity

Identifiers

PMID42337861
PMCPMC13305508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.