ArticleVox sanguinis2026
Survey of national and regional rare donor programmes regarding Immunoglobulin A deficiency.
Article in Vox sanguinis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesImmunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency is common and typically defined as <5-7 mg/dL. Individuals with absolute IgA deficiency (aIgA def) have extremely low levels, can produce allo-anti-IgA and may be at risk for anaphylactic transfusion reactions. There is no globally-accepted definition of aIgA def. We sought to determine how rare donor programmes define IgA deficiency (IgA def), how they test for it and how they manage requests for aIgA def blood products. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe queried rare blood donor programmes that participate in the International Society of Blood Transfusion Working Party on Rare Donors using an email survey sent to 39 members representing 35 programmes in 28 countries.
resultsResponses were obtained from 23 programmes in 16 countries. Seventeen included IgA def as a rare phenotype, with nine classifying IgA def as levels <0.05 mg/dL. Eight of the 14 programmes indicated that fulfilment of requests for IgA-deficient products requires clinical consultation and 8 programmes require patients to have detectable anti-IgA. Programmes reported provision of a small number of IgA-deficient products in the past 5 years.
conclusionWhile respondents from rare donor programmes in 17 countries include aIgA def as a rare blood phenotype, programmes in 5 countries do not. The level of IgA used to define IgA def varies among programmes and, in some cases, across programmes within the same country. Further study is needed to better understand IgA-mediated anaphylactic transfusion reactions. A recommendation is provided for managing transfusion support of patients considered at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.