ArticleBMC psychology2026
Active breaks as a physical education strategy to develop attention, concentration and attentional variability in higher education.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundActive breaks are an effective tool for introducing physical activity into the classroom and improving students' physical and mental health. This study aims (a) to evaluate changes in attention, concentration and attentional stability levels before and after the implementation of an intervention programme based on active breaks and (b) to analyse the associative relationships between attention, concentration and attentional stability before and after the intervention using a repeated-measures path analysis model.
methodThis is a quasi-experimental study with a single-group pre-test and post-test design without a control group. The sample consisted of 224 university students (20.57 ± 2.07). The d2 Attention Test was used to measure overall effectiveness, concentration, and attentional variability. The intervention lasted 15 weeks and included a weekly 10-minute active break during theory classes with physical-cognitive activities, choreographed boxing, and movement games.
resultsFindings showed improvements in attention, concentration and attentional stability following the intervention. The path analysis model also revealed strengthened associations between concentration, attentional stability and overall effectiveness after the intervention, alongside changes in the reciprocal relationship between concentration and attentional variability.
conclusionsActive breaks may represent a promising strategy in initial teacher training to optimize cognitive efficiency and promote more autonomous cognitive functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.