ArticleBMC anesthesiology2026
Heparin-binding protein and Endothelin-1 in critical COVID-19.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeparin-binding protein (HBP) is an inflammatory protein released by activated polymorphonuclear white cells. It has been suggested as a predictor of sepsis progression and organ dysfunction and plays a role in the pathophysiology of endothelial dysfunction. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor with pro-inflammatory effects, and high levels are found in patients with sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome. We investigated HBP and ET-1 plasma levels in critical COVID-19 disease with the aim of evaluating whether they were associated with 60-day mortality or the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). These levels were compared with those of a cohort of post-trauma intensive care unit (ICU) patients.
methodsWe included 96 patients with critical COVID-19 disease in 2020 and ten post-trauma ICU patients. Blood samples were collected at ICU admission, and plasma levels of HBP and ET-1 were measured. Clinical and laboratory data were collected until ICU discharge or death.
resultsIn COVID-19 patients, plasma levels of HBP were markedly increased, with a median level of 150 ng/ml (IQR 47-299), compared to 13.3 ng/ml (IQR 8.8-62.1), p < 0.0001 in the trauma ICU patients. There was no association between HBP levels and 60-day mortality or need for IMV. The levels of ET-1 were 1.6 pg/ml (IQR 1.2-1.9) in the COVID-19 cohort and 2.0 pg/ml (IQR 1.2-2.8), p = 0.25 in the trauma ICU cohort. COVID-19 patients requiring IMV hade higher ET-1 levels than those who did not require such treatment; however, no association was found in a logistic regression model when adjusted for age, sex and body mass index. There was no correlation between plasma HBP and ET-1 levels. Inflammatory parameters such as C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ferritin, and interleukin-6, were elevated but did not distinguish survivors from non-survivors.
conclusionWhile HBP levels are markedly elevated in critical COVID-19, they do not predict outcomes at ICU admission. ET-1 levels were also not linked to mortality or the need for IMV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.