Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42337714›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2026

Physiological and transcriptomic responses of sunflower to combined saline-alkali stress.

Jiangna Zheng, Xinlong Gao, Haina Zhang, Dan Li, Suen Liu, Mengzhe Li, Junyi Geng, Baosheng Guo, Cunpeng Zhao, Kaihui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jiangna Zheng *Institute of Cotton, Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, No. 598 Heping west, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, China.
Xinlong Gao *Institute of Cotton, Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, No. 598 Heping west, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, China.
Haina ZhangInstitute of Cotton, Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, No. 598 Heping west, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, China.
Dan LiInstitute of Cotton, Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, No. 598 Heping west, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, China.
Suen LiuInstitute of Cotton, Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, No. 598 Heping west, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, China.
Mengzhe LiInstitute of Cotton, Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, No. 598 Heping west, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, China.
Junyi GengInstitute of Cotton, Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, No. 598 Heping west, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, China.
Baosheng GuoInstitute of Cotton, Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, No. 598 Heping west, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, China.
Cunpeng ZhaoInstitute of Cotton, Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, No. 598 Heping west, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, China. zhaocunpeng@126.com.
Kaihui WangInstitute of Cotton, Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Genetic Breeding in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hebei Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Cultivation Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, No. 598 Heping west, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, China. kaihwang@126.com.

Funding

Hebei Province Agricultural Industry System Project HBCT2024050203, HBCT2024050201The HAAFS Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Project 2026KJCXZX-MHS-5The HAAFS International Science and Technology Cooperation Project 2026KJCXZX-MHS-GH01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), an important oilseed crop, is often used as a pioneer species for improving saline-alkali soils. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying sunflower seedling responses to combined saline-alkali stress remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the molecular basis of saline-alkali tolerance at the seedling stage by comparing physiological and transcriptomic responses between tolerant and sensitive sunflower hybrids. The saline-alkali tolerant hybrid K-27 and the sensitive hybrid K-7 were used as experimental materials. Root samples were collected at 0, 3, 12, 24, 48, and 96 h after exposure to combined saline-alkali stress (0.5% NaCl + Na

resultsPhenotypic analysis showed that the root length inhibition rate and fresh weight loss rate of K-27 were significantly lower than those of K-7, indicating stronger tolerance. Physiological analysis revealed that K-27 exhibited an inducible antioxidant enzyme response pattern. In addition, K-27 achieved osmotic adjustment through sustained proline accumulation (peaking at 12 h and remaining significantly higher than that of K-7 at 96 h) and exhibited higher basal levels of lignin and hemicellulose. Transcriptome analysis showed that the number of upregulated genes in K-27 was consistently higher than in K-7 at all time points, with 5,283 genes upregulated as early as 3 h after stress exposure. Venn analysis identified 44 core differentially expressed genes (cDEGs) shared between the two genotypes, which were mainly enriched in auxin biosynthesis regulation, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and glutathione metabolism. Among them, the benzoic acid carboxyl methyltransferase gene (BAMT) was continuously upregulated in K-27 but persistently downregulated in K-7. In addition, five other genes (encoding fatty aldehyde dehydrogenase, pectin methylesterase inhibitor, glutathione S-transferase, INPP5E, and HXXXD-type acyltransferase) exhibited significantly higher expression levels in K-27.

conclusionK-27 tolerates combined saline-alkali stress through coordinated multi-layered response mechanisms, including inducible antioxidant defense, maintenance of ion homeostasis, sustained osmotic adjustment, and activation of the phenylpropanoid metabolic pathway. Candidate genes such as BAMT may provide potential targets for molecular breeding of saline-alkali tolerant sunflower, although their functions require further experimental validation.

Indexed as

AlkaliesHelianthusSalt StressStress, PhysiologicalTranscriptomeGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant RootsSeedlingsAlkaliesBenzoic acid carboxymethyltransferase (BAMT)Combined saline-alkali stressPhenylpropanoid metabolismSunflowerTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID42337714
PMCPMC13543354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.