ArticleBMC psychology2026
Is happiness just a click away? Lessons learned from an unguided online well-being intervention for the general adult public.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWell-being websites and apps are increasingly available. Given their scalability and accessibility, online interventions are generally considered a promising avenue to promote public subjective well-being. However, the success of online interventions in public mental health promotion depends on widespread acceptance and sustained engagement. This study explores the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of an unguided online intervention for non-clinical Belgian adults.
methodsIn this quasi-experimental study, 208 participants were assigned to either the intervention group (n = 68) or control group (n = 140) based on their own preferences. The online intervention allowed participants to choose from a range of activities, including mindfulness, breathing exercises, walking, and cycling. Data were collected at baseline and after 8 months. Feasibility was assessed via uptake, attrition, and engagement. The assessment of acceptability was based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to balance the treatment arms and weighted linear mixed models were used to evaluate improvements in terms of subjective well-being, peace of mind, and meaningfulness.
resultsUptake of the intervention was low (32.7%) and dropout in the intervention group was substantial (63.2%). A major barrier to uptake was competing commitments. Non-completers had higher baseline negative affect (M = 2.54, SD = 0.56) than completers (M = 2.16, SD = 0.61). Among the completers, 81.3% found the intervention acceptable, yet 44.0% reported virtually no engagement. The intervention group showed statistically significant improvements in meaningfulness compared to the control group (β = 0.55, 95% CI [0,11; 0,99], p < 0.05), but not in other outcomes.
conclusionLow uptake, engagement, and adherence remain major obstacles to the success of unguided online interventions. Key lessons learned from this study highlight the need to address barriers to uptake during the design phase, implement strategies to sustain user motivation and engagement, and acknowledge that digital well-being interventions may not adequately support those who need it most.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.