ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Notational analysis of men's curling at the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics: comparing China with medal-winning teams.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the technical and tactical performance of the Chinese men's curling team in comparison with medal-winning teams during the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics, based on notational analysis of 34 matches. Guided by three research questions, the frequency and types of delivery and takeout techniques were first analysed, revealing that the Chinese team relied heavily on offensive shots such as draw and hit-and-rolls. In contrast, medal-winning teams adopted more balanced strategies, showing greater variability across both offensive and defensive shot types. Second, inter-team comparisons using Spearman correlation and chi-square tests showed that medalists demonstrated significantly higher tactical diversity and superior success rates in key shot types. Third, binary logistic regression was employed to evaluate the predictive value of specific tactical indicators. Promotion takeout success was found to be a significant positive predictor of match outcome (B = 1.150, p = 0.005), with a model classification accuracy of 85.7% and an AUC of 0.91. Conversely, sweeping success was negatively associated with winning (B = -0.200, p = 0.004), and its corresponding model achieved 76.2% accuracy and an AUC of 0.88. These findings suggest that sweeping may function as a compensatory tactic in high-pressure contexts. By combining descriptive, comparative, and predictive approaches, this study establishes a comprehensive framework for assessing elite curling performance and offers practical insights for coaching and strategic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.