ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2026
CT-based automatic segmentation of key CSF regions for detecting disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus.
Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus (DESH) is a characteristic neuroimaging feature of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), a treatable but frequently underdiagnosed condition. While brain MRI enables detailed region-based segmentation, CT is faster and widely used in daily clinical practice. However, objective and automated evaluation of DESH-related features on plain CT remains challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence-based segmentation model for automatically extracting four cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) regions from plain CT.
methodsSynthetic CT images were generated from annotated 3D T1-weighted MRI using a cycle-generative adversarial network (Cycle-GAN) to create training data. However, segmentation accuracy based on synthetic CT was insufficient. therefore, the final model was trained using manually annotated real CT images. A deep learning model was developed to segment four CSF regions (total ventricles, total subarachnoid space [SAS], high-convexity SAS, and Sylvian fissures with basal cisterns). Model performance was evaluated using an external validation dataset (30 DESH and 30 non-DESH). In addition, a second independent validation set consisting of 115 consecutive patients was used to assess clinical utility and determine optimal cutoff values using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
resultsBased on external validation Dice scores, Version 10 was adopted as the final model. In internal validation, the final model achieved Dice scores > 0.9 for total ventricles and > 0.8 for total intracranial CSF space, with lower scores for high-convexity SAS and Sylvian fissures with basal cisterns. External validation yielded Dice scores of 0.92, 0.85, 0.60, and 0.94 for the four regions, respectively. In the second validation set, the DESH index demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, with an area under the curve of 1.00 and an optimal cutoff value of 10 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%). Venthi and Sylhi indices also showed high diagnostic performance.
conclusionsThe proposed artificial intelligence model enables fully automated segmentation and quantitative assessment of DESH-related CSF regions on plain CT with high reliability. This approach may improve diagnostic accuracy, facilitate earlier detection, and support objective evaluation of postoperative changes in iNPH. Its applicability to routine CT makes it particularly valuable in settings where MRI is unavailable or contraindicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.