ArticleBMC nursing2026
Registered nurse-patient communication and decision-making in primary care consultations: a scoping review.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInternationally, interest in the expanding role of registered nurse-led consultations in primary care is increasing. This role requires effective communication to support triage and clinical decision-making. While physician‒patient communication has been extensively studied, research on registered nurse‒patient communication remains limited, particularly in primary care. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to map and describe how registered nurse-patient communication and decision-making in primary care consultations are characterised in the existing literature, based on observations of clinical practice.
methodsThis scoping review included a systematic literature search conducted in March 2025 in the PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus databases. A total of 12,066 records were identified and screened. The review followed the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley and adhered to the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines.
resultsA total of 16 studies were included. Registered nurse‒patient communication was observed using audio- and video-recorded observations and participant observations during telephone consultations (n = 5), chronic disease management consultations (n = 3), mental health consultations (n = 1) and walk-in clinic consultations (n = 7). Findings on communication and decision-making were organised into four themes related to the key characteristics of exploring patients' concerns, observing and assessing patients' health status, tailoring communication, and facilitating decision-making with patients.
conclusionThe findings indicate that registered nurses use various communication skills during different phases of consultations. However, comprehensive studies on registered nurse-patient communication and decision-making in primary care are lacking. This highlights the need for future in-depth and comprehensive studies on registered nurse-patient communication in primary care to inform both clinical practices and nursing education. TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: Prospero registration: PROSPERO 06 June 2023 CRD42023425582. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023425582 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.