ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2026
A pragmatist approach to bridging tables and ontologies through LinkML and punning.
Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOntologies support data integration and knowledge discovery across multiple life science disciplines through the application of formal semantics that define hierarchical and cross-hierarchical relationships which enable automated reasoning capabilities. At the same time, tabular data is by far the most commonly produced format of data in most disciplines. This is especially true in biodiversity dataset production. Creating rich semantic data from tables can be complex because of a mismatch between flat tabular data and hierarchical ontology models. Here, we present a practical approach for closing this gap using Linked Data Modeling Language (LinkML) in combination with OWL punning. LinkML allows tabular schemas to be formally defined, validated, and automatically documented. OWL punning allows schema elements to function simultaneously as both classes and data properties. This approach has many practical advantages that we showcase using mammal trait data assembled from the Ranges Digitization Network.
resultsOur work demonstrates how using LinkML + punning simplifies alignment of trait data in tabular format with ontologies such as the FuTRES Ontology of Vertebrate Traits (FOVT). Additionally, we show multiple advantages of our practical approach, including: maintaining synchronization between schema, ontology, and documentation, reducing modeling overhead, and preserving compatibility with conventional relational data workflows. On the downside, full logical reasoning is limited relative to more verbose RDF translations. Often this is a perfectly acceptable tradeoff for many use cases focused on data discovery and integration.
conclusionThe LinkML + punning framework shown here provides a scalable and pragmatic strategy for building semantically rich, ontology-aligned data resources that lower the barrier to semantic interoperability in biodiversity and trait informatics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.