ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Reduced metabolic energy cost in bounce squats driven by lower vasti contribution during the eccentric phase.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe back squat is a fundamental resistance exercise, yet technical variations such as bounce squats may substantially alter energetic demands. While previous research highlighted mechanical and neuromuscular effects of the stretch-shortening cycle, the phase-specific and muscle-specific metabolic consequences of bounce squats remain unclear. To inform training strategies aimed at improving movement economy or managing fatigue during high-volume training, this study examined how bounce influences whole-body and muscle-level metabolic energy cost across different loads using musculoskeletal simulation.
methodsNine resistance-trained adults performed bounce and standard squats under five loading conditions (0-100% body weight) while motion capture, ground reaction forces, and surface EMG were recorded. Musculoskeletal modeling was used to estimate instantaneous metabolic power, integrated to compute phase-specific energy costs.
resultsTwo-way repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that bounce squats reduced total metabolic energy cost by approximately 10.5% compared with standard squats (p < 0.001), with the most pronounced effect during the eccentric phase (25.5% lower, p < 0.001). Muscle-level analyses indicated that the vasti (VAS) consistently exhibited lower metabolic cost in bounce squats across loads during descent, highlighting their central role in energetic savings. In contrast, during the concentric phase, VAS and gluteus maximus costs scaled with external load, with no detectable benefit of bounce. Other lower body muscles showed statistical effects of squat type, but their absolute contributions were minimal.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that the energetic benefit of bounce squats is phase- and muscle-specific, reflecting the reduced metabolic cost of eccentric VAS control and tendon recoil during rapid reversal. Bounce squats may therefore enhance movement economy without diminishing mechanical loading, offering practical value for athletic performance and rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.