ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Time to catch-up: postnatal growth trajectories in preterm infants at a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreterm birth remains a significant global health concern, with long-term outcomes closely linked to postnatal growth trajectories. Data regarding the timing of catch-up growth in preterm infants from Middle Eastern populations are limited. This study aimed to assess the time required to achieve catch-up weight and to characterize postnatal growth trajectories across birth-weight categories at a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 134 preterm infants (< 37 weeks' gestational age) and 193 term infants born between January 2018 and early 2019 at King Saud University Medical City. Anthropometric measurements were recorded at predefined intervals up to 24 months of corrected age. Growth was evaluated using sex-specific Z-scores based on WHO Child Growth Standards. Catch-up growth was defined as a Z-score increase > 0.67 between two consecutive time points. Longitudinal weight and length trajectories were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with subject-specific random intercepts and a first-order autoregressive covariance structure, with adjusted estimated marginal means derived over time. Reporting followed the STROBE statement for cohort studies.
resultsPreterm infants had significantly lower birth weight (1.72 ± 0.60 kg vs. 2.97 ± 0.66 kg; p < 0.001) and birth length (40.65 ± 5.36 cm vs. 48.27 ± 3.55 cm; p < 0.001) compared with term infants. In mixed-effects models, preterm infants had lower adjusted weight overall (p = 0.006), but the group-by-age interaction was not significant (p = 0.271), indicating parallel weight gain over time. For length, a significant group-by-age interaction (p < 0.001) indicated that linear-growth trajectories differed between groups, with preterm infants remaining shorter throughout follow-up. Weight-for-age Z-scores converged across birth-weight categories by 24 months. Catch-up growth rates were highest among very low birth weight infants (31.8% by 24 months).
conclusionsPreterm infants demonstrate significant early growth deficits with weight catch-up achieved within the first year of corrected age, while linear growth recovery extends closer to 24 months. These findings underscore the importance of vigilant growth monitoring and individualized nutritional strategies during early infancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.