ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in older adults: from infection to outcomes - who gets sick, who gets hospitalized, who survives?
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a virus responsible for acute respiratory infections and is widely recognized as a major pathogen in the paediatric population. Thus, the burden of RSV in the adult population remains poorly understood, as epidemiological studies mainly rely on PMSI (Medicalization of Information Systems Program) data, which are coded for economic purposes, and because many adults RSV infections remain underdiagnosed. The aim of this study was to describe epidemiological and clinical characteristics of RSV infections in elderly population across four university hospitals in north-western France during the 2022-2023 epidemic season. This retrospective cohort included all patients aged 60 years and older who tested positive for RSV between September 1st, 2022, and January 31st, 2023, in four university hospitals. Viral detection was performed using molecular assays on respiratory samples. Clinical, demographic, biological, and coding data were collected from medical records and hospital information systems. Outcomes included need for oxygen therapy, intensive care admission, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, readmission within 90 days for a respiratory or cardiac reason, and changes in living arrangements. Statistical analyses used descriptive methods and standard tests for comparisons. A total of 647 patients were included. The mean age was 77.8 years, and most patients had at least one chronic medical condition, primarily respiratory or cardiac. 508 (78.5%) patients were hospitalized. The mean hospital stay was 16.2 days, and oxygen therapy was required in 68.3% of cases. In-hospital mortality reached 11.0%. Among survivors, 38.0% were readmitted within 90 days for a respiratory or cardiac reason. A notable proportion of patients experienced a loss of autonomy leading to institutional placement at discharge. RSV was coded in the PMSI database as a diagnosis in approximately two-thirds of hospitalizations, with substantial variations between centers. RSV infection in older adults was associated with significant morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and a frequent decline in functional status. The study also identified heterogeneity in coding practices and emphasized limitations of PMSI data for capturing respiratory syncytial virus burden. These findings support the need for expanded screening, along with targeted preventive strategies and structured post-discharge follow-up to reduce the long-term burden of RSV in older populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.