SynthesisBMC geriatrics2026
Comparative efficacy of various exercise types and doses for anxiety in older adults: A network and dose-response meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnxiety significantly impacts quality of life among older adults, particularly those with chronic conditions. Exercise has been established as an effective non-pharmacological intervention for anxiety, while the optimal type and dosage of exercise remain unclear. This study aimed to determine which exercise modality yields the largest efficacy for reducing anxiety and to model the optimal METs-min/week dose for anxiety reduction.
methodsThis systematic review and network meta-analysis searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases from database inception to 15 January 2025. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating exercise interventions among older adults (≥ 60 years) and extracted data from dose metrics (METs-min/week), treatment regimens, intensity, and study duration.
resultsTwenty-three RCTs with a total of 2093 participants were included in the analysis. Tai Chi emerged as the most effective exercise for reducing anxiety compared with the control group (SMD = - 1.37, 95% CI: -2.03 to - 0.71). Resistance training (RT), Yoga, Qigong and aerobic exercise (AE) also demonstrated relative efficacy. However, mixed exercise (MIX) did not yield significant effects. Dose-response analysis indicated that Tai Chi demonstrated optimal efficacy for alleviating anxiety in older adults at a dose of 500 METs-min/week, with statistically significant effects observed at a relatively lower dose (340 METs-min/week).
conclusionOur findings indicate that Tai Chi is the most effective exercise for alleviating anxiety in older adults. In contrast, MIX showed no significant effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.