Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42337442›Full record

Observational studyBMC infectious diseases2026

Bacterial bloodstream infections in cardiac patients: microbiological spectrum, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and biomarker correlation analysis at a cardiac tertiary care centre.

Moiz Ahmed Khan, Shajiya Saeed, Ziauddin Afrozuddin, Wajid Ali Khan

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Moiz Ahmed KhanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory and Blood Bank, Tabba Heart Institute, ST-01, Block 2 Azizabad Main Rd, Federal B Area Azizabad Block 8 Gulberg Town, Karachi, 75950, Pakistan. moiz.khan@tabbaheart.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2726-277X
Shajiya SaeedDepartment of Clinical Laboratory and Blood Bank, Tabba Heart Institute, ST-01, Block 2 Azizabad Main Rd, Federal B Area Azizabad Block 8 Gulberg Town, Karachi, 75950, Pakistan.
Ziauddin AfrozuddinDepartment of Clinical Laboratory and Blood Bank, Tabba Heart Institute, ST-01, Block 2 Azizabad Main Rd, Federal B Area Azizabad Block 8 Gulberg Town, Karachi, 75950, Pakistan.
Wajid Ali KhanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory and Blood Bank, Tabba Heart Institute, ST-01, Block 2 Azizabad Main Rd, Federal B Area Azizabad Block 8 Gulberg Town, Karachi, 75950, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBloodstream infections (BSIs) in cardiac patients represent a significant clinical challenge with substantial morbidity and mortality. Understanding the microbiological profile and biomarker patterns in this high-risk population is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies and infection prevention measures.

methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted analyzing patient data from 1st November 2024 to 31st October 2025 at a tertiary cardiac care centre in Karachi, Pakistan. During this period, 25,532 cardiac patients were admitted, and 547 blood cultures were obtained from admitted patients. Blood cultures from 113 BSI episodes in cardiac inpatients were analyzed for bacterial identification and susceptibility patterns. Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured simultaneously with microbiological investigation. Correlation analysis between biomarkers and pathogen types was performed using both Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients.

resultsOne hundred and thirteen BSI episodes yielding bacterial isolates were identified with gram-negative bacteria predominating (63.7%, n = 72) over gram-positive organisms (36.3%, n = 41). Escherichia coli was the most prevalent pathogen (17.7%, n = 20), followed by Acinetobacter species (9.7%, n = 11) and Enterobacter species (8.8%, n = 10). Multidrug-resistant organisms accounted for 16.8% (n = 19) of isolates, with Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (8.8%) and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (8.0%) being the most common. Gram-negative bacteria demonstrated higher mean PCT levels (16.60 ng/mL) compared to gram-positive bacteria (12.24 ng/mL), though not statistically significant (p = 0.094). CRP levels were similarly elevated in both groups (gram-negative: 138.18 mg/L vs. gram-positive: 118.09 mg/L, p = 0.216). Spearman correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between PCT and CRP (ρ = 0.444, p < 0.001) overall, with stronger correlation in gram-positive infections (ρ = 0.510) compared to gram-negative infections (ρ = 0.372).

conclusionThis study confirms the critical importance of understanding local microbiological epidemiology and biomarker patterns in cardiac patients with BSI, providing evidence-based guidance for empirical antimicrobial therapy, infection prevention strategies, and diagnostic algorithm optimization in tertiary cardiac care settings. PCT and CRP both serve as valuable biomarkers in this population, with their combined use potentially enhancing diagnostic accuracy, supporting their complementary role in sepsis management and antimicrobial stewardship in cardiac patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBacteriaAgedBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPakistanProcalcitoninAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinProcalcitoninAntimicrobial resistanceBiomarkersBloodstream infectionCardiac diseaseC-reactive proteinGram-negative bacteriaProcalcitoninSepsis

Identifiers

PMID42337442
PMCPMC13551791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.