ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Prognostic value of the systemic immune-inflammation index in acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective single-center cohort study.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a life-threatening emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Current risk stratification tools have limitations in predicting short-term outcomes. The Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), a composite biomarker integrating platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts, has shown prognostic value across various acute conditions; however, its utility in NVUGIB remains unexplored.
methodsIn this retrospective single-center cohort study, 812 adults presenting with NVUGIB to the emergency department of Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital (Istanbul, Turkey) were analyzed. SII was calculated as (platelet count × neutrophil count) / lymphocyte count. Primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality; secondary outcome was 72-hour rebleeding. Discriminative performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared with established risk scores (Glasgow-Blatchford Score, pre-endoscopic Rockall Score, complete Rockall Score, and AIMS65). Independent predictors were identified using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analyses.
resultsThe 28-day mortality rate was 6.5% (n = 53) and the 72-hour rebleeding rate was 11.1% (n = 90). Median SII was significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors [1,714.9 (IQR: 980.5-3,776.0) vs. 910.5 (IQR: 599.3-1,501.0); p < 0.001]. For 28-day mortality, SII achieved an AUC of 0.704 (95% CI: 0.622-0.785), comparable to established scoring systems (all p > 0.05 by DeLong test). Notably, SII demonstrated superior discriminative performance for 72-hour rebleeding (AUC = 0.767; 95% CI: 0.714-0.820), significantly outperforming GBS (AUC = 0.540), AIMS65 (AUC = 0.541), pre-endoscopic Rockall Score (AUC = 0.561), and complete Rockall Score (AUC = 0.554). In multivariable logistic regression, SII (per 100 units; OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.02-1.03; p < 0.001) was an independent predictor of mortality. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that adding SII to existing scores improved net clinical benefit.
conclusionsSII is an independent prognostic marker in NVUGIB, offering discriminative performance for 28-day mortality comparable to established risk scores and superior performance for 72-hour rebleeding prediction. As a simple, routinely available laboratory index, SII may complement existing risk stratification tools in the emergency management of NVUGIB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.