Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42337376›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2026

Acetylcholine: a candidate substrate for hippocampal predictive learning?

William de Cothi, Sarah Shipley, Caswell Barry

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William de CothiResearch Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5624-9196
Sarah ShipleyResearch Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5601-0847
Caswell BarryResearch Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, UK. caswell.barry@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-0649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetylcholine release in the hippocampus has been associated with diverse neural functions in learning and memory, including novelty, uncertainty detection, error correction, arousal and hidden state inference, while also modulating theta oscillations. Confronted with this plurality of roles, a unifying framework for interpreting cholinergic function is lacking. Recently, predictive models have emerged as a normative lens for understanding neural function, viewing the brain as learning to predict environmental dynamics. Within this framework, we propose that hippocampal acetylcholine serves as a fundamental learning signal, encoding state transition prediction errors - the magnitude of mismatches between predicted and actual transitions in environmental states. We suggest that, analogously to how dopamine signals reward prediction errors to guide value learning, acetylcholine guides structural learning, signalling state transition prediction errors. By condensing behaviour onto timescales amenable to spike-timing-dependent plasticity, theta sequences provide a potential substrate for calculating state transition prediction errors and driving the synaptic updates that revise the internal world model. Within the septo-hippocampal circuit, we propose that theta sequences relay predictions to the septum for comparison against observed state transitions, with the resulting cholinergic feedback gating plasticity in proportion to the mismatch. Plausibly, this mechanistic account unifies the diverse roles of acetylcholine, from novelty detection to hidden state inference, as aspects of a single computational principle - learning predictive internal world models from precisely-timed neural sequences.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineHippocampusLearningAnimalsHumansNeuronal PlasticityAcetylcholine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.