ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Semi-automatic mask guidance enhances 3D tumor segmentation in medical imaging.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate tumor segmentation is essential for early diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognostic evaluation. Although manual annotation can achieve high accuracy, it is time-consuming and requires substantial expert involvement. While deep learning has significantly advanced medical image analysis, fully automated methods often fail to segment atypical lesions within complex abdominal anatomy, leading to missed lesions and misclassification of normal tissues, which may compromise clinical decision-making.
methodsTo address these challenges, we incorporated guidance masks into a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning framework. Using our Star-Rain software, users place interactive clicks on lesion locations, and the system adaptively generates task-specific guidance masks. This approach directs the model's attention to relevant regions, particularly in atypical or anatomically complex cases.
resultsOur method is validated on four independent cohorts comprising 1,217 CT scans from 726 patients, encompassing hepatic, renal, and pancreatic tumors. Across these datasets, our approach outperforms state-of-the-art baseline models on independent test sets, achieving Dice scores consistently above 0.7 and reducing the false negative rate (FNR) by 0.006 to 0.346 compared to the best fully automated approaches. In addition, the model's segmentation outputs effectively support downstream prognosis tasks, highlighting its clinical value.
conclusionsThese findings underscore the promise of semi-automatic deep learning frameworks that integrate minimal user input for reliable tumor segmentation. The proposed approach offers a practical and robust solution for clinical applications, enhancing segmentation accuracy and decision support while reducing the annotation burden.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.