ArticleScientific reports2026
A novel fully implicit method for calculating fluid saturation distribution in immiscible gas flooding and its application.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compared with water-flooding reservoirs, gas-flooding reservoirs exhibit more complex characteristics, primarily attributed to the significant viscosity difference between the displacing phase and the displaced phase. Under the influence of the equation of state, gas viscosity and deviation factor are binary functions of temperature and pressure. As the reservoir recovery degree increases, regardless of the injection strategy employed, the reservoir pressure will present a complex heterogeneous spatial distribution. When analyzing the variation of gas saturation at different positions during the production process, it is necessary to consider the effects of reservoir pressure at the corresponding location on gas viscosity and compressibility. An extensive literature review reveals that most publicly published studies on fluid saturation in gas-flooding reservoirs are based on numerical reservoir simulation methods, where the gas state equation is introduced for quantitative description. Based on the Buckley-Leverett water-flooding equation, this study proceeds as follows: ① Firstly, a one-dimensional homogeneous radial flow tube model is established. Considering that the fractional flow curve is an S-shaped nonlinear function, a novel fully implicit method is adopted to automatically search and calculate the optimal water saturation value at each spatial step and time step. ② Secondly, considering the heterogeneity of the actual model, a multi-flow tube model accounting for permeability variation is further constructed; the fingering phenomenon of the displacing phase considering heterogeneity can be obtained by averaging the saturation distribution changes of different flow tubes. ③ Thirdly, considering the compressibility and viscosity variation of gas, the volume conservation in the water-flooding mode is converted into the mass conservation in the gas-flooding mode. Subsequently, combined with the Buckley-Leverett equation and the fully implicit solution applied to the multi-flow tube model, the fluid saturation distribution of immiscible gas flooding can be derived. The proposed method in this paper is applied to interpret and analyze the field data of an actual restricted channel gas-flooding case, and the theoretically calculated gas breakthrough time of the oil well is in high agreement with the actual data. This research method features rigorous theoretical derivation and has been verified to be feasible through practical application, thereby providing certain practical guidance and reference significance for reservoir engineering researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.