SynthesisLab animal2026
Analgesic drug efficacy in mouse postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Lab animal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of postoperative pain is a critical ethical concern and a challenge in laboratory animal research, particularly for mice. Surgical procedures are routinely conducted in mice, but the use of analgesic drugs is underreported and the assessment of their efficacy is limited. This systematic review assesses the efficacy of analgesic drugs for postoperative pain in mice, addressing the influence of various factors, including sex, surgical invasiveness, pain modalities and analgesic classes. A systematic literature search resulted in 48 eligible studies included in the qualitative analysis and 43 in the quantitative analysis. The overall pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for analgesic drugs was 0.46 (95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.60), indicating a positive pain-reducing effect. Subgroup analysis revealed that analgesic treatment was significantly more effective in male (SMD 0.84; 0.60 to 1.08) than in female mice, in mild (SMD 0.57; 0.38 to 0.75) than in severe surgical procedures and in reducing evoked pain (SMD 1.12; 0.83 to 1.41) than in reducing spontaneous pain. In addition, almost all analgesic drug classes tested, including opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen and local anesthetics were effective in reducing evoked pain but not spontaneous pain (SMD 0.12; -0.03 to 0.27). However, most studies present limitations that could produce a high risk of bias. Taken together, our results indicate that, although analgesic drugs can reduce postoperative pain in mice, their efficacy is reduced in females, severely invasive surgeries and spontaneous pain. Thus, high-quality studies are still needed to answer ethical concerns and to guarantee full analgesia in laboratory mice submitted to surgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.