ArticleScientific reports2026
Influence of pollen from different species on the fruit quality of 'Hongyang' kiwifruit.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate pollen types on the fruit quality of 'Hongyang' kiwifruit, providing a scientific basis for rational pollinizer tree allocation. Using 'Hongyang' as the test material and commercial pollen as the control, pollen from 12 male plants of 2 species ( Actinidia chinesis var. Deliciosa and A. chinensis ) was used to pollinate in orchards. PCA was applied for comprehensive evaluation of the pollinated fruit. The results were as follows: (1) Male A. chinesis var. deliciosa plants had a later flowering period but more pollen than male A. chinensis plants did, and there were notable intraspecific differences in floral traits. Among the six tested male plants of A. chinensis ('a-1', 'a-2', 'a-3', 'a-5', 'a-6', 'a-7'), their flowering periods basically overlap with those of 'Hongyang', while the other materials were 5-23 days later than 'Hongyang'.(2) 'Hongyang' had a significant pollen xenia on the fruit set, quality, and seed characteristics, particularly showing large differences in single fruit weight, sugar-acid ratio, vitamin C content, flesh color, and seed number. Different pollen pollination treatments had different impacts on 'Hongyang' fruit quality. (3) According to principal component scores, floral organ characteristics, and flowering period evaluations, male A. chinensis plants 'a-6', 'a-2', and 'a-7' are suitable and compatible pollinizers for 'Hongyang', whereas the male A. chinensis var. deliciosa male plants 'a-10' and 'a-12' are recommended for poststorage artificial pollination. In conclusion, there are significant differences in floral traits among inter- and intraspecific male kiwifruit plants. Pollen donor choice notably affects the key quality indicators of 'Hongyang'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.