ArticleNPJ science of food2026
DNA metabarcoding for food authentication: identification of freshwater, marine, and terrestrial gastropods in commercial food products.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food fraud through species substitution has been reported for edible gastropods, particularly in processed products where morphological identification is not feasible. DNA-based methods have been used to identify gastropod species in food products, but are largely limited to targeted analyses. To address this limitation, we applied, for the first time, an untargeted DNA metabarcoding approach to detect and identify gastropod species in processed foods. Mitochondrial 16S rDNA fragments of approximately 150 bp were analyzed. In 17 of 18 reference samples, taxa were resolved to genus or species level, in agreement with Codex Alimentarius Austriacus guidelines, facilitated by a curated reference database that enables assignments across freshwater, marine, and terrestrial gastropods. Thirteen DNA extract mixtures were analyzed for method validation, yielding few false-negative results for minor components. These likely resulted from primer-template mismatches causing amplification bias. Analysis of 20 commercial food products revealed seven mislabeled samples. The approach is compatible with established in-house metabarcoding assays targeting other animal species and consequently complements broad application across various taxa. This qualitative screening tool is suitable for routine food authentication, supporting supply chain transparency and regulatory monitoring.
Identifiers
42337283What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.