Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42337281›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Striking global similarities in dog-human interactions.

Juliane Bräuer, Yana Bender, Louise Jandke, Lea Ulverich, Henriette Mank, Christoph J Völter, Lana Takau, Justorien Rambeloniaina, Roberto Zariquiey, Mariana Poblete and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Juliane BräuerDogStudies, Department for General Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany. juliane.braeuer@uni-jena.de.
Yana BenderDogStudies, Department for General Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Louise JandkeDogStudies, Department for General Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Lea UlverichDogStudies, Department for General Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Henriette MankDogStudies, Department for General Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Christoph J VölterDepartment of Comparative Cultural Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Lana TakauDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Justorien RambeloniainaFaculté de Médecine, Département d'Enseignement des Sciences et de Médecine Vétérinaires, Université d'Antananarivo, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Roberto ZariquieyChana Station for Language Sciences and Interculturality, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru.
Mariana PobleteChana Station for Language Sciences and Interculturality, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru.
Stefan R SchweinbergerDogStudies, Department for General Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Russell D GrayDepartment of Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of our knowledge about the dog-human relationship comes from studies with dogs from 'WEIRD' (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) societies. Here, we investigate cultural differences in dog-owner interactions worldwide. To achieve this, we developed a test battery comprising six well-established social-cognitive experiments and a questionnaire that assessed the psychological and practical aspects of the dog-human bond. We tested hunting dogs alongside their owners in five rural societies across culturally diverse locations in various countries: Vanuatu, Mongolia, Madagascar, Peru, and Germany. Despite dramatic cultural and environmental differences, we found that dog-human relationships were remarkably similar. Residual differences may be attributed to variations in hunting techniques and differences between WEIRD and non-WEIRD societies.

Indexed as

Human-Animal BondAnimalsDogsFemaleHumansHuntingMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAnimal cognitionCultural differencesDog–human relationshipDomesticationNon-WEIRD countries

Identifiers

PMID42337281
PMCPMC13291251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.