Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42337149›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026

Residual inflammatory risk after percutaneous coronary intervention: current insights and future perspectives.

Tomoya Hara, Masataka Sata

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomoya HaraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 3-18-15, Kuramoto-cho, 770-8503, Tokushima, Japan. hara.tomoya.2@tokushima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0579-6196
Masataka SataDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 3-18-15, Kuramoto-cho, 770-8503, Tokushima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and contemporary secondary prevention, recurrent cardiovascular events remain a major clinical challenge. Increasing evidence suggests that persistent vascular inflammation contributes to residual cardiovascular risk after PCI, even in patients receiving optimal lipid-lowering therapy. Recent studies have highlighted the clinical relevance of inflammatory biomarkers, plaque vulnerability, and intracoronary imaging findings in predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes. In addition, anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies have emerged as promising approaches for residual risk reduction. This review summarizes current insights into the mechanisms, assessment, and potential therapeutic implications of residual inflammatory risk after PCI.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseInflammationPercutaneous Coronary InterventionBiomarkersHumansRisk FactorsBiomarkersAtherosclerosisCoronary artery diseasePercutaneous coronary interventionResidual inflammatory riskVascular inflammation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.