ArticleScientific reports2026
Reliability, repeatability, and age associations of the dogSIT (dog Smell Interaction Test) battery in untrained companion dogs (Canis lupus familiaris).
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current olfactory tests for untrained dogs have limitations due to use of a single odorant, requirement for ambulation, and potential for vision interference. We hypothesized that our new dogSIT odorant test battery measures would be reliable, repeatable, and age-associated in untrained companion dogs. Gently restrained dogs were presented with 18 odorants (in 9 pairs, one pair was subsequently excluded from analysis); odorants were contained in identical stainless-steel tea-balls. Odorants were presented for 30s in a habituation-dishabituation paradigm (4 consecutive presentations of the same odorant followed by a different odorant). Interaction times were measured post-hoc using masked video analysis; outcome measures represented novel interactions, habituation, and dishabituation. We assessed inter-rater reliability and test-retest repeatability (n = 25); and analyzed age, sex, and bodyweight covariates (n = 65). Outcome measures had significant inter-rater and test-retest repeatability. There was heterogeneity in odorant preference between dogs. Age, and to a lesser extent bodyweight and sex, were associated with outcome measures relating to novel odorant interaction and dishabituation. Our dogSIT battery is reliable, repeatable, and identified reduced odorant interaction behaviors in older dogs. Our findings have implications for research on food motivation and scent discrimination in aging dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.