Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42337050›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Reliability, repeatability, and age associations of the dogSIT (dog Smell Interaction Test) battery in untrained companion dogs (Canis lupus familiaris).

Amelia C Corona, Helena Harrison, Ryan G Hopper, Andrew L Smith, Callie M Rogers, Cassandra L Cook, Michele M Salzman, Kyle D Peterson, Nathaniel J Hall, Freya M Mowat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amelia C CoronaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Helena HarrisonBeloit College, Beloit, WI, USA.
Ryan G HopperDepartment of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Andrew L SmithDepartment of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Callie M RogersDepartment of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Cassandra L CookDepartment of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Michele M SalzmanDepartment of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Kyle D PetersonDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Nathaniel J HallDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Freya M MowatDepartment of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. mowat@wisc.edu.

Funding

UW Vision Research Core - Administrative CoreP30EY016665 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AKIHIRO IKEDA · 2005 to 2026
$12.6M
Companion dogs: sentinels for multimorbidity of human neurocognitive-sensory aging and susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease and related dementiasR01AG082907 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Freya Mowat · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Morris Animal Foundation D23CA-510NEI NIH HHS P30 EY016665NEI NIH HHS P30EY016665NIA NIH HHS R01 AG082907NIA NIH HHS R01AG082907Research to Prevent Blindness unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness Inc., to the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current olfactory tests for untrained dogs have limitations due to use of a single odorant, requirement for ambulation, and potential for vision interference. We hypothesized that our new dogSIT odorant test battery measures would be reliable, repeatable, and age-associated in untrained companion dogs. Gently restrained dogs were presented with 18 odorants (in 9 pairs, one pair was subsequently excluded from analysis); odorants were contained in identical stainless-steel tea-balls. Odorants were presented for 30s in a habituation-dishabituation paradigm (4 consecutive presentations of the same odorant followed by a different odorant). Interaction times were measured post-hoc using masked video analysis; outcome measures represented novel interactions, habituation, and dishabituation. We assessed inter-rater reliability and test-retest repeatability (n = 25); and analyzed age, sex, and bodyweight covariates (n = 65). Outcome measures had significant inter-rater and test-retest repeatability. There was heterogeneity in odorant preference between dogs. Age, and to a lesser extent bodyweight and sex, were associated with outcome measures relating to novel odorant interaction and dishabituation. Our dogSIT battery is reliable, repeatable, and identified reduced odorant interaction behaviors in older dogs. Our findings have implications for research on food motivation and scent discrimination in aging dogs.

Indexed as

OdorantsSmellAge FactorsAgingAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDogsFemaleMaleOlfactory PerceptionReproducibility of ResultsAgingBehaviorCanineFood motivationSense of smell

Identifiers

PMID42337050
PMCPMC13503687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.