Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42337038›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Multi-objective optimization of urban blue-green space configuration using NSGA-II for enhanced ecosystem services.

Yangyang Yuan, Mingzhu Yang, Siqi Tang, Shangcen Luo, Jingwen Mao, Sidan Yao, Qianyu Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yangyang YuanSchool of Architecture, Southeast University, Sipailou Campus, 2 Sipailou, Xuanwu District, Nanjing, 210096, Jiangsu, China. yyy@seu.edu.cn.
Mingzhu YangSchool of Architecture, Southeast University, Sipailou Campus, 2 Sipailou, Xuanwu District, Nanjing, 210096, Jiangsu, China.
Siqi TangSchool of Architecture, Southeast University, Sipailou Campus, 2 Sipailou, Xuanwu District, Nanjing, 210096, Jiangsu, China.
Shangcen LuoSchool of Architecture, Southeast University, Sipailou Campus, 2 Sipailou, Xuanwu District, Nanjing, 210096, Jiangsu, China.
Jingwen MaoSchool of Architecture, Southeast University, Sipailou Campus, 2 Sipailou, Xuanwu District, Nanjing, 210096, Jiangsu, China.
Sidan YaoSchool of Architecture, Southeast University, Sipailou Campus, 2 Sipailou, Xuanwu District, Nanjing, 210096, Jiangsu, China.
Qianyu HongSchool of Architecture, Southeast University, Sipailou Campus, 2 Sipailou, Xuanwu District, Nanjing, 210096, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 51838003Southeast University Zhishan Young Scholars Support Program Grant No. 2242023R400027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exacerbation of global climate change has led to the continuous deterioration of the urban ecological environment. Scientifically planning blue-green spaces can mitigate ecological crises and promote sustainable urban development. There exists a close relationship between the ecological benefits of blue-green spaces and their spatial characteristics, and synergistically enhancing the ecological service efficiency of blue-green spaces through these two aspects is an urgent research topic. This study integrates four ecological benefit objectives-carbon sink, cooling, stormwater resilience, and biodiversity-and applies a multi-objective optimization framework based on grid-based spatial decision units to optimize blue-green space configurations. By establishing a multi-ecological benefit evaluation framework, this study combines ecological benefit assessment models with the NSGA-II multi-objective optimization algorithm and the entropy weight method for weight allocation. Ultimately, an optimal scenario and four preference-oriented scenarios for blue-green space layouts are derived. A case study in Nanjing, China, demonstrates the applicability of the integrated optimization framework in generating urban blue-green spatial layouts that balance multiple ecological benefit objectives. The results indicate that carbon sink and cooling show a positive synergy, while biodiversity and stormwater resilience exhibit trade-off tendencies, and the comprehensive scenario achieves a relatively balanced performance across objectives. The spatial layout characteristics of blue-green spaces vary distinctively across different ecological benefit objectives, with the multi-objective comprehensive optimal under the given proxies, constraints and algorithm settings demonstrating relative balance. The proposed multi-objective optimization methodology for blue-green spatial configuration provides scientifically quantifiable decision-making support for urban blue-green space planning.

Indexed as

Ecological benefitsMulti-objective optimizationMulti-scenario simulationNon-dominated sorting genetic algorithmUrban blue-green space

Identifiers

PMID42337038
PMCPMC13578240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.