ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-objective optimization of urban blue-green space configuration using NSGA-II for enhanced ecosystem services.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The exacerbation of global climate change has led to the continuous deterioration of the urban ecological environment. Scientifically planning blue-green spaces can mitigate ecological crises and promote sustainable urban development. There exists a close relationship between the ecological benefits of blue-green spaces and their spatial characteristics, and synergistically enhancing the ecological service efficiency of blue-green spaces through these two aspects is an urgent research topic. This study integrates four ecological benefit objectives-carbon sink, cooling, stormwater resilience, and biodiversity-and applies a multi-objective optimization framework based on grid-based spatial decision units to optimize blue-green space configurations. By establishing a multi-ecological benefit evaluation framework, this study combines ecological benefit assessment models with the NSGA-II multi-objective optimization algorithm and the entropy weight method for weight allocation. Ultimately, an optimal scenario and four preference-oriented scenarios for blue-green space layouts are derived. A case study in Nanjing, China, demonstrates the applicability of the integrated optimization framework in generating urban blue-green spatial layouts that balance multiple ecological benefit objectives. The results indicate that carbon sink and cooling show a positive synergy, while biodiversity and stormwater resilience exhibit trade-off tendencies, and the comprehensive scenario achieves a relatively balanced performance across objectives. The spatial layout characteristics of blue-green spaces vary distinctively across different ecological benefit objectives, with the multi-objective comprehensive optimal under the given proxies, constraints and algorithm settings demonstrating relative balance. The proposed multi-objective optimization methodology for blue-green spatial configuration provides scientifically quantifiable decision-making support for urban blue-green space planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.