Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42337034›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026

Timing and microbiological profile influence long-term outcomes after debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in acute hip periprosthetic joint infection.

Ernesto Muñoz-Mahamud, Juan Carlos Perdomo-Lizarraga, Andrés Combalia, Alfonso Alías, Adrià Serra, Jenaro Ángel Fernández-Valencia, Miguel Ángel Verdejo, Álex Soriano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ernesto Muñoz-MahamudDepartament de Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques,Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. emunoz@clinic.cat.
Juan Carlos Perdomo-LizarragaDepartament de Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques,Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Andrés CombaliaDepartament de Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques,Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Alfonso AlíasDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Adrià SerraDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jenaro Ángel Fernández-ValenciaDepartament de Cirurgia i Especialitats Medicoquirúrgiques,Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), c. Casanova, 143, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Miguel Ángel VerdejoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Álex SorianoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe strategy of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) represents one of the main therapeutic modalities for acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, reported outcomes remain highly variable, with success rates ranging from 16 to 92%. This study aimed to evaluate long-term treatment failure-free survival and identify risk factors for treatment failure in patients with acute hip PJI treated with DAIR using time-to-event analytical methods. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis retrospective study evaluated the treatment failure rate in 115 patients treated with the DAIR strategy for acute PJI following primary or aseptic revision hip arthroplasty between 1999 and 2018. Potential predictors of treatment failure-free survival, including patient characteristics, infection microbiology, and surgical timing, were analyzed using univariate tests, Cox proportional hazards regression (hazard ratio [HR]), and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.

resultsAmong the 115 patients included, 56 were women and 59 were men; 48 were aged 75 years or younger and 67 were older than 75 years. In 88 cases, the infection occurred after primary arthroplasty, whereas 27 followed aseptic revision surgery. The mean follow-up was 7.1 years (SD 4.4). At five years, treatment failure occurred in 30.4% of cases. Procedures performed within seven days of diagnosis showed lower failure rates than those after the first week following diagnosis (27.5% vs 53.8%, p = 0.05; HR = 2.09, 95% CI 0.91-4.79). Failure was more frequent after revision arthroplasty compared with primary arthroplasty (48.1% vs 25%, p = 0.02; HR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.08-4.27) and in polymicrobial infections compared with monomicrobial infections (47.8% vs 24.5%, p = 0.04; HR = 2.32, 95% CI 1.13-4.77). No other variables showed a significant association with failure risk.

conclusionRevision arthroplasty and polymicrobial infections were associated with higher failure rates after DAIR. Lower failure rates were observed among patients treated within seven days of diagnosis, although this finding should be interpreted with caution and warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsArthroplasty, Replacement, HipDebridementHip ProsthesisProsthesis-Related InfectionsProsthesis RetentionAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment FailureAnti-Bacterial AgentsDebridement and implant retentionPeriprosthetic joint infectionRisk factorsSurgical timingTotal hip arthroplastyTreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42337034
PMCPMC13290824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.