Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42337004›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Modeling and prediction of 316 L stainless steel relative density in L-PBF process using machine learning.

Saleh Asnaashari, Sadegh Yousefi, Maria P Nikolova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saleh AsnaashariSchool of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, University College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. esnaashari.saleh@ut.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8437-6106
Sadegh YousefiFerdows Department of Education (Ministry of Education), Experimental Sciences Teacher, Ferdows, Iran. s.yousei@semnan.ac.ir.
Maria P NikolovaDepartment of Material Science and Technology, University of Ruse "Angel Kanchev", 8 Studentska Str, 7017, Ruse, Bulgaria.

Funding

the Ministry of Innovation and Growth of the Republic of Bulgaria BG16RFPR002-1.014-0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the prediction of relative density in L‑PBF parts using machine learning models trained on a literature-based dataset comprising 287 experimental measurements collected from previously published studies. The input parameters for the proposed models included laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing. To model the nonlinear relationship between process variables and relative density, k-nearest neighbours (KNN), adaptive boosting decision trees (AdaBoost-DT), and four multilayer perceptron (MLP) models optimised using Scaled Conjugate Gradient (SCG), Levenberg-Marquardt (LM), Bayesian Regularisation (BR), and Resilient Backpropagation (RB) were developed. The predictions from these six models were subsequently integrated into a single framework using a committee machine intelligence system (CMIS), which provided improved predictive performance. Model accuracy was evaluated using statistical metrics including the coefficient of determination (R²), standard deviation (SD), average percent relative error (APRE), average absolute percent relative error (AAPRE), and root mean square error (RMSE). The results showed that the proposed hybrid modelling framework can effectively capture the complex relationship between L‑PBF process parameters and relative density. However, the heterogeneity of the literature-based dataset and the presence of a limited number of outliers may introduce uncertainty into the predictions.

Indexed as

AdaBoost-DTCommittee machine intelligent systemK-nearest neighboursLaser powder bed fusionMultilayer perceptronRelative density

Identifiers

PMID42337004
PMCPMC13575131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.