Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42336983›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Cable versus cerclage wire in weber tension band fixation for transverse olecranon fractures: a biomechanical study in a synthetic ulna model.

Recep Selcuk Eyceyurt, Onur Suer, Meliksah Uzakgider, Mesut Tahta, Mahmut Pekedis, Cemil Kayali, Ahmet Adnan Karaarslan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Recep Selcuk EyceyurtDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Izmir City Hospital, 35530, Bayrakli, Izmir, Turkey. reyceyurt@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1451-9896
Onur SuerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Izmir City Hospital, 35530, Bayrakli, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6751-0705
Meliksah UzakgiderDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Izmir City Hospital, 35530, Bayrakli, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7098-2642
Mesut TahtaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences, Izmir City Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9660-1350
Mahmut PekedisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3350-0277
Cemil KayaliDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences, Izmir City Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6260-0744
Ahmet Adnan KaraarslanDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences, Izmir City Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7387-8832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stable fixation of displaced simple transverse olecranon fractures is required to maintain reduction under triceps traction and enable early elbow motion. Although Weber tension band fixation is widely used, the biomechanical influence of tension band material (cable vs cerclage wire) across different pin/anchorage designs remains unclear. This study compared resistance to fracture-line separation among six Weber-based constructs in a standardized synthetic ulna model. Sixty commercially available synthetic ulnae were osteotomized to create a transverse olecranon fracture model (Mayo type IIA) and randomly assigned to six groups (n = 10/group): bicortical pins, eyelet pins, and AA crimp constructs, each combined with either cable or cerclage wire in a figure-of-eight configuration. Specimens underwent monotonic tensile loading simulating triceps traction. Forces corresponding to 2 mm and 3 mm fracture-line separation were recorded. Between-group comparisons were performed within cable and cerclage subgroups, and cable-versus-cerclage comparisons were conducted within matched constructs (α = 0.05). At 2-mm separation, mean forces (N) were 316.1 ± 98.1 (bicortical cable), 277.0 ± 101.7 (eyelet cable), and 249.1 ± 104.2 (AA crimp cable), versus 273.1 ± 34.4 (bicortical cerclage), 283.6 ± 38.4 (eyelet cerclage), and 282.2 ± 36.9 (AA crimp cerclage). At 3-mm separation, mean forces were 340.5 ± 129.6, 336.5 ± 111.0, and 319.4 ± 78.8 for the cable constructs, and 332.9 ± 48.3, 354.7 ± 42.4, and 349.0 ± 37.2 for the cerclage constructs (bicortical, eyelet, and AA crimp, respectively). No significant differences were observed among pin/anchorage designs within the cable or cerclage subgroups at either threshold (all p > 0.05). Similarly, cable versus cerclage comparisons within matched constructs showed no significant differences at 2 mm or 3 mm (all p > 0.05). Under the specific conditions of this synthetic ulna model and monotonic tensile loading protocol, no statistically significant differences were detected between cable- and cerclage wire-based Weber tension-band constructs at either the 2-mm or 3-mm separation threshold. Bicortical, eyelet, and AA-crimp-based configurations also showed no significant differences in early gapping resistance. These findings should be interpreted as controlled monotonic early-separation data and not as evidence of clinical equivalence or fatigue durability.

Indexed as

Bone WiresFracture Fixation, InternalOlecranon FractureOlecranon ProcessUlnaBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansTensile StrengthBiomechanical studyCableCerclage wireFracture-line separationOlecranon fractureTension band wiring

Identifiers

PMID42336983
PMCPMC13503694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.