ArticleScientific reports2026
An innovative fuzzy Revan index with CRITIC integration in multi-criterion decision-making.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces the fuzzy Revan index (FRI), a new comprehensive index of fuzzy graphs that can be used to facilitate multi-criteria decision-making under uncertainty. Unlike other fuzzy graph indices that only consider local structural properties, the FRI uses membership values for both vertices and edges to identify larger connectivity patterns. We defined its theoretical properties, such as the upper bounds of particular classes of graphs, and implemented a computational algorithm with a pseudocode that can be used for large-scale networks. In this context, the FRI was integrated with a CRITIC-based approach to make decisions, wherein the membership values were calculated using the sigmoid and multiplicative methods. A national highway site selection problem was considered to illustrate the relevance of the proposed approach for real-world applications. Six site locations were evaluated based on a fuzzy graph derived from five weighted criteria: land acquisition price, environmental considerations, geotechnical suitability, accessibility, and future expansion potential. Combining FRI values with a multi-criteria decision-making method provides a more comprehensive site ranking than that obtained using local measurements. The findings indicate how FRI can enhance the quality of evaluation in uncertain and complex settings and its wider application in the field of information science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.