ArticleScientific reports2026
Partially occluded weed classification using vision transformers and convolutional neural networks for precision agriculture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated weed detection is essential for site-specific herbicide application, that can result into the reduced environmental footprint of conventional agriculture. However, for field deployment of automated weeding devices, occlusion remains a critical challenge that can weaken the precision of weed identification. Here, we compare the performance of Vision Transformers (ViT-B16 & PvTv2) and Convolutional Neural Networks (EfficientNet-B0 & ResNet-50) in accurate weed detection, using controlled synthetic occlusion levels (0%, 25%, and 50%). We found that ViT-B16 has superior occlusion resilience, with image testing accuracy increasing from 80% to 86% under 50% occlusion. In contrast, the testing accuracy of PvTv2, EfficientNet-B0 and ResNet-50 dropped from 45 to 76% under similar conditions. Multivariable regression confirmed architecture type as the dominant testing accuracy driver (p ≤ 0.001), with ViTs outperforming CNNs by an average of 14.56% points. These results suggest that occlusion resilience is not uniform across architectural variants but depends critically on attention-based design. Consequently, for real time deployable automatic weed detection systems, hybrid architectures that balance ViT global context with CNN computational efficiency represent a critical future direction. Such approaches can support precise herbicide application, reduce chemical inputs, and enable more sustainable crop protection through reliable AI-driven automation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.