ArticleScientific reports2026
A hybrid method for assessing the perceived cultural value of cultural and creative products in e-commerce visual-textual presentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the consumption of cultural and creative products (CCPs) increasingly shifts to e-commerce channels, consumers rely heavily on online visual-textual displays to perceive and compare cultural value, whereas systematic design-oriented methods for assessing such perceived value remain insufficient. To address this gap, this study proposes a hybrid method for assessing the perceived cultural value of CCPs in e-commerce visual-textual presentation. First, a three-domain indicator framework covering formal representation, usage inference, and meaning construction is developed by integrating hierarchical cultural semantics with narrative-structure organization, and refined through content validity testing. Second, a hybrid DEMATEL-CRITIC-MULTIMOORA model is used to integrate indicator influence and alternative-performance variation across indicators for weight determination, followed by multi-perspective alternative ranking. Using cultural aromatherapy burners as a case, Kendall's concordance tests reveal evident divergence in expert judgments, with W = 0.128 and p = 0.797 for indicator interaction judgments, and W = 0.414 and p = 0.066 for indicator-level assessments of alternative performance. Within this context, the model outputs should be interpreted as structured perceived cultural value assessment results aggregated from heterogeneous expert judgments, rather than as objective measurements of products' intrinsic cultural quality. External questionnaire validation demonstrates relatively high rank-order consistency between the model results and user-side assessments (Spearman's ρ = 0.829; Kendall's τ = 0.733). The proposed approach transforms implicit cultural semantic features of CCPs into observable and comparable evidence, providing a decision-support reference for competitor comparison, visual-textual presentation refinement, and CCP design practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.