ArticleScientific reports2026
An analytical approach for predicting vibrations in new tunnels undercrossing existing double-track railways.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As urban rail transit networks become increasingly dense, new tunnels frequently undercross existing operational lines. The cyclic loads from existing double-track trains pose a threat to the structural safety of the underlying sections. This paper proposes a computationally efficient analytical model for the 'double-track train-soil layer-underpass tunnel section' system. In this model, the double-track train is represented as a moving two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) sprung mass system, the soil is modeled as a spring-damper system, and the underpass tunnel roof structure is treated as an Euler-Bernoulli simply supported beam. The system response is solved using the modal superposition method. Key parameters are calibrated via displacement back analysis, and the model's predictive capability is validated against FLAC3D simulations and independent field measurement data. A systematic parametric study investigates the influence of train speed, tunnel beam length, overburden thickness, equivalent stiffness, and soil mechanical parameters. The analysis reveals the underlying mechanisms of system resonance and critical design parameters. For the specific case study, resonance peaks were observed at speeds around 48 km/h and 72 km/h, a dual-peak resonance phenomenon emerged at beam lengths of approximately 25 m and 45 m, and a vibration amplification effect was identified at a soil cover thickness near 5 m. These findings highlight the resonance mechanisms that should be avoided in design, while the specific critical parameter values are case-dependent and should be re-calibrated for other projects. Increasing the equivalent beam stiffness can effectively suppress the vibration response, while grouting reinforcement modulated the system's dynamic response. This study provides a theoretical framework and an efficient preliminary assessment tool for understanding vibration mechanisms and aiding early-stage design in similar projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.