ArticleScientific reports2026
Hypertuned boosting approach with Local Binary Pattern and Pivot Distribution Count method feature extractor for glaucoma identification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glaucoma, the second largest cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, causes significant damage to the optic nerve. Early diagnosis of glaucoma is crucial since without it, there will be continuous deterioration of vision. Manual detection of glaucoma based on fundus images is a tedious and potentially inaccurate process, making it important to develop computer-aided glaucoma detection systems. This paper introduces a hybrid approach to glaucoma detection that involves the use of Local Binary Pattern (LBP) and Pivot Distribution Count (PDC) feature extraction methods for the analysis of retinal fundus images. LBP is a technique that involves the extraction of texture-based features, whereas PDC is a feature extraction algorithm that involves the extraction of white-pixel intensity and fractal dimension from retinal fundus images. In this study, features were extracted and classified using different machine learning algorithms such as SVM, Decision Trees (DT), Random Forest (RF), KNN, Adaboost, Gradient Boosting, XGboost, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, and CatBoost. Moreover, grid search cross validation, randomized search cross validation, genetic algorithm, and Bayesian optimization were also applied to optimize the performance of LightGBM and Catboost classifiers. The proposed Hybrid LBP-PDC method provided maximum classification accuracy of 97.55% using the CatBoost and LightGBM classifiers. Moreover, we have developed a robust and efficient methodology for the automatic glaucoma screening using the retinal fundus image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.