ArticleScientific reports2026
Digital twin optimization of water supply pump stations considering energy use, water hammer, and lifespan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water supply pump stations operate under multiple and often conflicting requirements related to energy efficiency, hydraulic safety, and equipment durability. To address this problem, this study develops a digital-twin-assisted multi-objective optimisation framework for pump station operation, in which energy consumption, water hammer peak pressure, and equipment lifespan are considered simultaneously. Using the first-stage pumping station of the South Main Line of the Yellow River Diversion Project in Shanxi Province as a case study, a digital twin model is constructed from historical records, equipment parameters, and real-time monitoring data, and an improved Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) is introduced to generate feasible Pareto solutions under operational constraints. The model validation results show that the mean simulation errors of energy consumption, water hammer peak pressure, and lifespan prediction are 3.13%, 2.14%, and 7.29%, respectively, while the response time remains within 0.4 s. Compared with the conventional operating scheme, the selected compromise solution reduces energy consumption by 12.0%, lowers water hammer peak pressure by 15.0%, and improves equipment lifespan by 9.0%, with full constraint satisfaction. The improved NSGA-II also shows better convergence, diversity, and feasible-solution performance than the traditional algorithm. Field trial results further indicate that the proposed framework can support safer, more efficient, and more stable pump station operation. This study provides a practical basis for multi-objective operational optimisation of water supply pump stations under dynamic operating conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.