ArticleScientific reports2026
Graph informed biomarker discovery framework using transcriptomic machine learning for glioblastoma prognosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying reproducible, interpretable prognostic signals from high-dimensional transcriptomics remains challenging because gene-level models often ignore network context. We developed Graph-Informed Biomarker Discovery (GIBD), a locked transcriptomics-only framework for primary glioblastoma that integrates RNA-seq expression with high-confidence STRING topology through weighted protein-protein interaction (WPPI) self-preserving feature construction. Model development, feature selection, scaler fitting, threshold selection, and locking used The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) only, followed by post-lock external validation in the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA). The final TCGA cohort included 147 patients, and the empirical TCGA median overall survival of 357 days defined binary risk groups. The binary-evaluable CGGA cohort included 131 patients. The locked GIBD-XGBoost K100 model used 100 features (65 WPPI-derived, 35 raw-expression features) and threshold 0.53. TCGA out-of-fold AUC was 0.617. Post-lock CGGA validation yielded an AUC of 0.609, sensitivity of 73.9%, specificity of 50.6%, balanced accuracy of 62.3%, and a C-index of 0.537. SHAP identified TSPAN13 as the strongest global contributor, and full-transcriptome TCGA GSEA identified 156 terms at FDR < 0.05, with coherent high-risk inflammatory, hypoxic, metabolic, extracellular-matrix, complement/coagulation, and angiogenic enrichment. GIBD preserved an external transcriptomic risk-prioritization signal requiring prospective recalibration and multimodal validation before translational use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.