ArticleScientific data2026
Improving FAIRness of Geospatial data using Large Language Models.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The FAIR principles- Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability have become central to enhancing the value, transparency, and longevity of scientific data. Yet in the geospatial domain, implementing FAIR practices often remains uneven, reflecting gaps between formal standards compliance and practical usability within complex data infrastructures. Here, we examine how large language models (LLMs) can support the operationalisation of FAIR-aligned geospatial data stewardship. Drawing on practical experiences in geospatial FAIR implementation and a targeted synthesis of emerging LLM-enabled applications, we discuss how LLMs can assist various FAIR-related elements, including metadata enrichment, semantic alignment, multilingual discovery, and natural-language interaction with geospatial services. We further address technical, institutional and epistemic challenges associated with using LLMs and propose solutions that include hybrid validation approaches, confidence-aware workflows and transparent AI provenance indicators to mitigate automation bias and support trustworthy reuse. Building on these insights, we outline a research agenda for AI-supported FAIR (fAIr) centred on evaluation benchmarks, domain-tuned and resource-efficient models, explainable and auditable AI, and standards-integrated system architectures. We frame LLMs as assistive technologies that can help scale and embed FAIR principles within evolving geospatial research infrastructures, rather than replacements for traditional stewardship practices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.