ArticleScientific reports2026
Delayed intubation and 60-day mortality in severe COVID-19-associated acute respiratory failure in an emulated target trial using the OUTCOMEREA network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The benefits of non-invasive respiratory support strategies (NIRS), such as high-flow nasal oxygen therapy, in delaying intubation remain uncertain. We used an emulated target trial approach to evaluate outcomes associated with late intubation in patients with severe acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study using the French prospective OUTCOMEREA database. Adult patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia with an ICU length of stay of at least seven days were included in the study. Descriptive analyses were used to compare patients who were intubated after day 6 with those who remained under NIRS. In the emulated target trial, patients who were eligible between ICU days 7 and 12 were assigned to undergo late intubation or to remain under NIRS. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used. The primary outcome was 60-day mortality. Of the 1206 ICU patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, 288 were still in the ICU on day 7. Of these, 65 (22.6%) subsequently underwent late intubation and had a 60-day mortality rate of 78.5%. In the emulated target trial, which included 234 patients at risk of intubation, 57 underwent late intubation. Late intubation was associated with a higher risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.89; 95% confidence interval: 1.50-3.92). The estimated absolute difference in 60-day survival was - 0.34 (95% CI - 0.62 to 0.30). The restricted mean survival time was 17.8 days shorter in the late intubation group (95% CI - 30.6 to 10.8). In this multicentre cohort, patients requiring late intubation had a very high mortality rate. In the emulated target trial analysis, late intubation was associated with poorer survival compared to continued NIRS, suggesting a subgroup of patients with progressive respiratory failure rather than a direct effect of intubation timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.