ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2026
Objective dyspnea measurement in real time using a forehead wearable and artificial intelligence.
Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dyspnea is a complex symptom measured using subjective patient-reported ratings. Continuous, automated dyspnea measurements are needed, especially in critical care and trauma settings with impaired patient communication. We prospectively enrolled 54 pulmonary rehabilitation subjects. Participants completed two treadmill walking trials, during which dyspnea measurements were collected at one-minute intervals automatically using physiologic sensors and patient-reported ratings of perceived breathlessness and exertion (RPB and RPE). The sensor data were used to train machine learning models using either 19 or 7 features to generate an objective dyspnea score (ODS). Classification performance was assessed on a held-out test set, compared against patient-reported RPB and RPE. The model trained on 7 features performed best, resulting in a correlation between predicted and actual scores (percent accuracy) of 0.84 (78.7%) for RPE and 0.86 (83.6%) for RPB. Our system incorporating ODS accurately predicts patients' subjective dyspnea scores and is promising for automated, real-time dyspnea measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.