Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42336826›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Quantum estimation with state symmetry-induced optimal measurements.

Jia-Xuan Liu, Hai-Long Shi, Chunfeng Wu, Sixia Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jia-Xuan Liu *Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and School of Physical Sciences, Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Hai-Long Shi *INO-CNR and LENS, Firenze, Italy.
Chunfeng WuScience, Mathematics and Technology, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore. chunfeng_wu@sutd.edu.sg.
Sixia YuHefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and School of Physical Sciences, Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China. yusixia@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2818-0643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central challenge in quantum metrology is identifying optimal measurements that saturate the quantum Cramér-Rao bound under realistic constraints, e.g., local measurements. We show that symmetries of the probe state provide a general principle for identifying optimal measurement strategies. Building on this idea, we demonstrate that when a parameter is encoded in the real coefficients of a fixed-basis expansion, the optimal measurement reduces to projection in that basis, with an application to critical metrology. Under local-measurement constraints, we show that local state symmetries provide a systematic route to constructing optimal local measurements. We illustrate this framework using graph states, explicitly constructing optimal local measurements from their local symmetries. Furthermore, weak and strong connection rules are introduced to generate broader classes of graph states that achieve Heisenberg-scaling precision using local measurements. By relaxing the number of stabilizer generators, graph states are extended to a stabilizer-code subspace. Analytical and numerical results show that coherent states in these subspaces offer multiple metrological advantages: high precision, partial noise resilience, local-measurement accessibility, and built-in error correction. These findings advance the theory of optimal measurements in quantum metrology and underscore the central role of state symmetry.

Identifiers

PMID42336826
PMCPMC13443195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.