Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42336792›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Family or caregiver outcomes after critical illness (FOCUS): a protocol for a core outcome set development study.

Claire Brown, Peter Hartley, Alexandra Malyon, Bronwen Connolly, Nazir I Lone, Joanne McPeake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claire BrownCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7993-4989
Peter HartleyCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Alexandra MalyonCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Bronwen ConnollyWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5676-5497
Nazir I LoneThe Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Joanne McPeakeThe Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK jm2565@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8206-6801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFamily members of survivors of critical illness are known to experience adverse outcomes in the months following the critical care admission, which can impact their physical, social and emotional health. This protocol describes the Family or Caregiver Outcomes after critical illness (FOCUS) study, which aims to develop a core outcome set (COS) for trials involving family members of critical care patients across the continuum of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A modified Delphi consensus process with researcher, clinician and patient/caregiver stakeholder groups and consensus meetings for ratification of findings, resolving uncertainty and developing an action plan for COS implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The FOCUS COS will inform relevant stakeholders about important outcomes for family members of critical care patients and may enhance the future design and conduct of trials in this area. This study has been approved by the University of Cambridge Psychology Research Ethics Committee. The COS will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and engagement with key stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: COMET database (https://comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1977).

Indexed as

CaregiversCritical CareCritical IllnessFamilyOutcome Assessment, Health CareConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansResearch DesignAdult intensive & critical careCaregiversClinical ProtocolsDelphi Technique

Identifiers

PMID42336792
PMCPMC13295962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.