ArticleBMJ open2026
What is the interplay between self-care confidence, professional support and health literacy among UK adults? A cross-sectional online survey study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe WHO defines self-care as 'the ability of individuals, families and communities to promote health, prevent disease, maintain health and cope with illness and disability with or without the support of a healthcare provider', while self-care confidence refers to an individual's perceived ability to effectively engage in these activities. The interface between health and care professionals (HCPs) and the public is pivotal in promoting self-care behaviours, yet barriers such as health literacy deficits, professional constraints, misconceptions and disparities in self-care confidence persist.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore how self-care confidence, professional support and health literacy interact to influence self-care behaviours among UK adults.
designCross-sectional online survey.
settingCommunity-based national study of adults across primary care and community care settings in the UK.
participantsCommunity-dwelling UK adults aged 18 years and above, including HCPs, were recruited from June to September 2024 via social media, online research participant recruitment platforms and professional networks. Participants provided demographic information including age, gender, ethnicity, employment, education, disability status and UK region. Data collected from adults aged ≥18 residing in the UK able to complete an online questionnaire in English were included. Incomplete survey responses or duplicate entries were excluded.
interventionsNone (observational study). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: self-reported confidence in maintaining a healthy lifestyle and managing common illnesses. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: accessibility to health information, health literacy (measured using the validated WHO Action Network on Measuring Population and Organizational Health Literacy instrument, HLS19-Q12), self-reported knowledge of National Health Service guidelines and receipt of professional encouragement to self-care.
resultsA total of 3255 community-dwelling UK adults (members of the general public) participated in the study. A subset of 227 participants self-identified as HCPs. Most respondents (88.5%) reported confidence in maintaining a healthy lifestyle; 91.9% felt confident managing common illnesses. Locating professional help when ill was perceived as easy (77.4%) but not evaluating treatment options (51.4% difficult/very diffcult) or mental health information accessibility (43.6% difficult/very difficult). Among HCPs, 94.7% endorsed the importance of self-care but cited patient reluctance to engage or take responsibility (64.8%), understanding (59.0%), time constraints (42.7%) and health literacy challenges (45.8%) as key barriers. In the general population, 68.6% found screening information accessible but 28.1% struggled with interpretation. Regression analyses revealed that older adults (65+) were significantly less confident in self-care with professional guidance (adjusted OR (aOR)=0.50 (0.33-0.74), p=0.001), whereas males (aOR=1.41 (1.23-1.62), p<0.001) and black/Asian British individuals (aORs=2.31 (1.66-3.21), 1.98 (1.51-2.61); p<0.001) reported higher confidence levels.
conclusionThis study highlights the complex relationship between professional guidance, self-care confidence and health literacy. While most individuals value and engage in self-care, critical disparities persist, particularly in health literacy and access to digital resources. Targeted interventions and strengthening the public-healthcare professional dialogue and interface will be crucial in advancing self-care as a sustainable pillar of healthcare policy and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.