ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2026
Clinical implications of a very late presentation in myasthenia gravis: real world experience in a tertiary center.
Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an immune-mediated disease with a bimodal incidence: early-onset (< 50 years, predominantly female) and late-onset (> 50 years, predominantly male). Recently, a subgroup with very late-onset (≥ 65 years) has been described; however, its clinical relevance concerning disease course and prognosis remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the potential clinical implications of very late presentations of MG. Methods: The present is a retrospective cohort study comprising all patients diagnosed with MG currently followed up in the Neuromuscular Disorders Unit of a tertiary center. Clinical and paraclinical parameters including number of hospitalization and current regime were evaluated. Results: A total of 92 patients were included, 51 (55.4%) of whom were female. Concerning the age of onset, 23 (25.6%) patients were classified as very late-onset. In order to better understand the clinical implications of a later onset, we compare the very late-onset subgroup to the late-onset subgroup. Gender distribution and number of patients with minimal manifestation status or better did not statistically differ between these subgroups. Myasthenic crisis and refractoriness were more frequent in the late-onset subgroup compared with very late-onset, but no statistical difference was found ( Conclusion: Our study suggests that the recently established subgroup of very late-onset may not be clinically distinct from late-onset MG, as these patients seem to exhibit a similar clinical trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.