ArticleApplied clinical informatics2026
Electronic Strategies for Tailored Exercise to Prevent Falls: Evaluating Implementation in Primary Care.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Falls are the leading cause of injury and injury-related death among older adults. Clinical decision support (CDS) may improve clinician referral and patient access to fall prevention exercise. Objectives: We evaluated implementation of a CDS intervention linking high-risk older adults to gait and balance exercises and identified patient and clinician factors associated with success. Methods: Using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, we evaluated implementation year 1 after a 3-month wash-in period at clinics in an academic health system. Community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 65 seen in person by a physician or advanced practice provider were eligible. We implemented standardized fall risk screening, a CDS alert for positive screens, linked electronic order sets for gait and balance exercise, and preconfigured documentation text. We assessed reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance; the primary outcome was connection to exercise via order sets or confirmed ongoing gait and balance exercise. Hierarchical logistic regression evaluated associations between patient and clinician characteristics and odds of this outcome. Results: The CDS alert reached 5,458 of 5,891 eligible patients (92.6%); 1,664 (30.5%) were connected to exercise. Male patient sex (odds ratio [OR]: 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.95) was associated with lower odds of connection, while multiple recent falls or a fall with injury increased odds (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.02-1.49) compared with self-reported fear of falling. Variation in adoption by clinician was substantial (intraclass correlation coefficient approximately, 30%). No significant differences were found by patient age, race/ethnicity, or insurance, nor for clinician department or qualification. Conclusion: CDS can identify older adults at high fall risk and prompt referral to gait and balance exercise. However, adoption was modest and varied by clinician, with patient sex and recent fall history influencing uptake. Targeted strategies to improve clinician adoption and address patient biases may enhance implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.