ArticlePlant physiology2026
Resistance to embolism is critical for postdrought recovery in resprouting Ceratonia siliqua.
Article in Plant physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Xylem embolism persists long after drought has ended and should thus have a lasting effect on plants' ability to recover from severe drought. This assumption has rarely been tested, as quantifying the amount of embolism in individual intact trees is difficult, and following recovery would require long-term monitoring, specifically when studying trees. Our goal was to test the effect of embolism on recovery from drought in a broad population. We exposed 210 carob seedlings (Ceratonia siliqua), a species with high resistance to embolism, to a gradient of drought durations and monitored their ability to recover over five months with respect to their embolism level (assessed using micro-computed tomography). Seedlings that suffered 38% embolism had a 50% chance of dying. In the surviving seedlings, stomatal conductance was still inhibited a month after rehydration (ie 82% lower than in the irrigated control, even in plants that sustained only 10% embolism) but recovered to pre-drought levels after 5 months, regardless of the embolism levels. The hydraulic limitations were mostly noticed in the canopy size, as 5 months after rehydration, canopy area and the ability to resprout were strongly correlated with embolism level sustained during drought (but not with water potential). Our results suggest that embolism can be fatal even at levels below 50% and that maintaining the integrity of the hydraulic system is critical for rapid drought recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.